
A brand new report Thursday claimed even deeper monetary ties between Supreme Courtroom Justice Clarence Thomas and billionaire Republican donor Harlan Crow.
Based on ProPublica, Crow paid for personal faculty tuition for Thomas’ great-nephew Mark Martin, who Thomas stated he would elevate as a son.
The publication stated Crow paid $6,200 a month for Martin’s 2009 attendance at Hidden Lake Academy, citing a financial institution assertion and an interview with a former administrator on the faculty. That former administrator advised ProPublica Crow advised him he additionally paid for Martin’s tuition at Randolph-Macon Academy, which he attended earlier than Hidden Lake Academy.
The entire quantity paid by Crow is unclear however could have exceeded $150,000, the outlet reported. Thomas didn’t report the funds in his monetary information, though he disclosed one other $5,000 reward for Martin’s training from another person in 2002.
Crow’s workplace stated in an announcement to ABC Information Crow “has lengthy been passionate in regards to the significance of high quality training and giving again to the much less lucky, significantly at-risk youth,” and that he and his spouse have supported many younger Individuals via the varsity.
“These grants and different contributions have at all times been paid solely from private funds, generally held within the household enterprise and paid for by the household enterprise,” the workplace stated. “It’s disappointing that these with partisan political pursuits would search to show tuition into one thing shameful or political by serving to at-risk youth.”
Neither the Supreme Courtroom nor Choose Thomas have commented to ABC Information on the brand new pro-publica report.

Affiliate Justice of the Supreme Courtroom Clarence Thomas poses throughout a gaggle portrait on the Supreme Courtroom in Washington October 7, 2022.
Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters, FILE
Thomas has come beneath scrutiny since ProPublica’s first report final month, which revealed that he and his spouse have been handled to luxurious personal journey and lodging by Crow, and did not disclose them in its annual monetary stories.
In response to that report, Thomas stated it was his understanding that he was beneath no obligation to report “this kind of private hospitality from shut private mates.”
The revelation prompted Democrats to push for better scrutiny of the Supreme Courtroom and urged judges to undertake a proper code of conduct. The Excessive Courtroom is the one federal physique not topic to an enforceable code of ethics.
“The judges performed outdoors the field,” Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat, stated earlier this week at a Judiciary Committee listening to on the difficulty.
However any legislative effort to drive the court docket to cross a code will face fierce opposition from Republicans. GOP lawmakers defended Thomas in the course of the justice listening to and accused Democrats of “selective outrage” as they listed different judges who beforehand acquired all-expenses-paid journey and money awards.
The judiciary has additionally rejected proposals for impartial oversight and necessary compliance with ethics guidelines.
In a joint assertion, all 9 judges pledged to voluntarily adhere to a normal code of conduct and “seek the advice of a wide range of authorities to handle particular moral points.”
“This assertion goals to carry new readability to the authorized career and the general public about how judges tackle sure recurring points,” they wrote, “and in addition seeks to dispel some widespread misconceptions.”